American Media are Biased and ....

the "Big Six" Media Corporation divides Americans, and Negatively Incites Americans!

Here is a perfect example of bias and slanted journalism that divides as well as incites people, negatively.

Note to the readers:
 This blog is not about pro=gay or anti-gay, it's about the abuse of the American Media. I have to
clarify that because when people see the word Gay or Bible, they go ballistic.

"Gay-rights activist rips Bible, mocks teens fleeing room"

Dan Savage knows how to work a room. He also knows how to clear one out. The founder of the "It Gets Better" project did both during a recent speech at a high school journalism convention in Seattle. He called the Bible pro-slavery and argued that if the Bible got something like slavery wrong, then anti-gay protesters shouldn't use the book as a defense for their views. As you can see in this video, some students applauded while others walked out. Savage called those fleeing the room "pansy ass" and later apologized if he "hurt anyone's feelings."
http://now.msn.com/now/0428-savage-bible-speech.aspx

The headlines as I saw and heard would have said:

Gay-rights activist questions Bible, comments on teens walking out of the room.


The truth his like so many people in history raise questions about the bibles literary accuracy. Not one person was fleeing from the room. The fact was, they walked out in a slow pace, many with smiles on their faces.
 As to referring to those leaving is evidence of people with a closed mind, and do not want to listen to anyone else's opinion that does not conform to theirs. It's a person of weak character and is use tens of thousands of time in today's media. Here is an example from Paste Magizine.com "The central message of 24 seems to be that we've seen enough pansy-ass pussyfooting in dealing with inhumane terrorists who deserve our wrath"
http://www.pastemagazine.com/articles/2009/10/high-definition-dexter-24-the-fallenness-of-man.html

The Media are parts of, and promote power for the "One Percent." The closest they want a Middle-Class Candidate near the White House is with a group of people on tour. Let's talk how the power of the media, can promote wars. One of the (the "Big Six)

                                                           Click on Picture to enlarge.

is Time Warmers/CNN/GE, are the most powerful media that has been guilty of all the allegations that I have put before you, the readers. Ther're Altruistic and humanitarian News stories give those on "Main Street, middle Americans," They really care. It pacifies the "Middle Class" that represents
over 72 % percent of the American population that has the
power to put a president from the "middle class" in the White
House; however, they have never used it. Thus, we never have
had a true "middle class" president in America. The big
Media, like CNN make sure the 'Middle Class" never see one of
their own. If they did give coverage to a "middle-class"
presidential candidate that does not ask or money, does not
have any staff consisting of the spin-masters, the focus
groups to tell him what to say, and how to dress and act, The
"Middle Class" could possible give him the 4 % percent needed
to be in the presidential debate.
Can you imagine a 6'5' 270 pound "middle class" man standing
on stage wearing an entire outfit from head to toe that cost
less than Mitt Romney's tie. Also, to make matters worse,
when he opens his mouth and speaks words that are his own and
the truth as he knows it. It would shock the very core of the
politically corrupt election fiasco. The Constitution does
not say we have to be governed by the "Upper Class" or a
politician. What the Constitution says are the qualifications
to run for the office of the president of the United States:
"Age and Citizenship requirements - US Constitution, Article
II, Section 1
No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the
United States, at the time of the adoption of this
Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President;
neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall
not have attained to the age of thirty-five years, and been
fourteen years a resident within the United States."
http://www.presidentsusa.net/qualifications.html
The Media have promoted wars and shared known propaganda from
our Government, to get the American people on board. They
helped cultivate: "that if you were not for the wars Middle
East, then you did not support our troops or president bush;
therefore, you would be labeled anti-American. Just ask the
Dixie Chicks.
Insert CNN>
"Dixie Chicks pulled from air after bashing Bush"
Friday, March 14, 2003 Posted: 7:45 PM EST (0045 GMT)
http://www.cnn.com/2003/SHOWBIZ/Music/03/14/dixie.chicks.reut
/
No person ever expressed how to manipulate people and any
Nation to go to war through the media was, Hermann Goering
Hermann Goering's
Quote
On War And The People
3-20-2
"Naturally the common people don't want war: Neither in
Russia, nor in England, nor for that matter in Germany. That
is understood. But, after all, IT IS THE LEADERS of the
country who determine the policy and it is always a simple
matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy,
or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist
dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be
brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you
have to do is TELL THEM THEY ARE BEING ATTACKED, and denounce
the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the
country to danger. IT WORKS THE SAME IN ANY COUNTRY."
--Goering at the Nuremberg Trials
http://www.rense.com/general21/wara.htm
The reason I talk about war in relationship to media is the
misinformation they give to the public causes so many
humansto dies and is the most serious of misuse of the power
of the media that devastate lives.
If you want to see the real reason we went to war in the
Middle East, and read how Bush and Chaney want a war, and 9-
11 gave them the excuse.
http://charliebigfeet.blogspot.com/2011/07/dick-cheneys-
song-of-america-drafting.html/
As to the Media only affording free media coverage to the
"upper class" wealthy politicians that are well funded by
special interest individuals and groups or corporations;
there are no laws that say any media corporation has to give
coverage to us in the lower classes. However, it is very
unAmericans, unethical and immoral to me. But the "middle
class enjoys being governed by the "One Percent" because they
do nothing to change it by demanding media interview "middle
class" presidential candidates. I just do not understand how
they can get mad and stop Bank of American charging $5.00 at
the ATM, and stopping Verizon from charging a $2.00 service
charge; however, they cannot be bothered to help give a voice
or power to the people, the "middle class."